Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Om Prakash Arora (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Om Prakash Arora (ITAT Delhi) Reopening Upheld; Deemed Dividend & Section 14A Deletions Confirmed, but Short-Term Capital Loss on Property Reversed The Delhi Bench of the ITAT delivered a detailed ruling covering reopening, deemed dividend, section 14A disallowance, cash deposits, sundry creditors, commission payments, and large property transactions for AYs 2015-16 and 2016-17. On reopening under sections 147/148, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee’s cross-objection and upheld validity of reassessment. It held that the Additional/Joint Commissioner had concurrent jurisdiction, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930