Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pankaj Jindal Contractor Vs DCIT (ITAT Amritsar)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Pankaj Jindal Contractor Vs DCIT (ITAT Amritsar)

Reopening After Four Years Quashed as Change of Opinion — Disallowance Under Section 40A(3) and Addition Under Section 68 Set Aside

The Amritsar Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal in full and quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated under Sections 147/148Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Assessment Quashed for Missing One-Month DRP Deadline Section 153C Assessment Must Begin from Last Assessed Income Double Addition of Capital Gains Declared in Return Disallowed No Immunity for Karta: Personal Assets Reachable in Execution Reassessment Quashed for Borrowed Satisfaction and No Live Nexus View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031