Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that revisional powers under Section 263 cannot be exercised when the Assessing Officer has already examined the iss...
Income Tax : ITAT quashed PCIT’s Section 263 order, holding AO’s treatment of survey income as business income valid and not erroneous or p...
Income Tax : Ahmedabad ITAT quashes reassessments based on ACB report, ruling the AO lacked independent "reason to believe" and only used borro...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune upholds PCIT's order u/s 263, setting aside an assessment for failure to verify ₹82.64 crore in advances for property...
Income Tax : National Chamber of Industries & Commerce, U.P has made a representation against Indiscriminate notices by the Income Tax Depa...
Income Tax : KSCAA has made a Representation on Challenges in Income Tax Related to Rectification Proceedings, Order Giving Effect, Delay in P...
Income Tax : One of the key sources of dispute is the existing arrangement for follow up on audit objections by Internal Audit Party and the Re...
Income Tax : The ITAT Amritsar held that a valuation report by itself cannot justify addition under Section 69 without evidence of extra paymen...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that amortization of BOT road project expenditure must be computed based on the actual concession period and not ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that the reassessment order could not be revised under Section 263 since the conditions for treating jewellery e...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that assessment orders passed pursuant to earlier remand directions were barred by limitation under Section 15...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT held that an Assessing Officer cannot make additions beyond the specific issues remanded by the Principal Commissioner ...
Post completion of assessment, information was received from DDIT(Inv.) Unit-5(2), Mumbai that the share of Gemstone Investment Ltd. was a penny stock and assessee was a beneficiary from trading of the above shares.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition invoking provisions of section 50C(2) of the Income Tax Act without referring the valuation of the capital asset to the valuation officer is not justifiable. Accordingly, matter restored back to AO to refer the matter to valuation officer for determining Fair Market Value.
ITAT Mumbai sets aside PCIT’s order under Section 263, finding the assessment view was plausible and PCIT invoked power without quantifying revenue loss.
Mumbai ITAT sets aside CIT order, ruling original assessment valid despite unproven allegations of unexplained cash for flat purchase.
Laxmi Road Lines withdraws tax appeal at ITAT Panaji after opting for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme to settle dispute over PCIT’s Section 263 order.
Delhi High Court held that no addition on account of sale of fly ash since the entire sale proceeds of fly ash were deposited in a fly ash utilization fund and the said funds were to be spent only in accordance with directions issued by Government.
By way of this appeal, the assessee has challenged the correctness of the order of the Learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Rajkot passed u/s.263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 31/03/2024 for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that revisionary order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act in the name of non-existent entity (amalgamated company) is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
ITAT Ahmedabad partly sets aside PCIT order, rules PCIT cannot issue mandatory direction to add income for accommodation entries under Section 263.
ITAT upholds PCIT’s revision of an assessment order. The AO failed to probe cash payment for a second property purchase, rendering the initial order erroneous and prejudicial.