Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohammedaarif Yunusbhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Mohammedaarif Yunusbhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition invoking provisions of section 50C(2) of the Income Tax Act without referring the valuation of the capital asset to the valuation officer is not justifiable. Accordingly, matter restored back to AO to refer the matter to valuation officer for determining Fair Market Value.

Facts- An information was received by AO that the assessee had sold immovable property, in which he was one third co-owner, for a consideration of Rs.91,00,000/-. Thus, the case was reopened by the AO b

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30