Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that revisional powers under Section 263 cannot be exercised when the Assessing Officer has already examined the iss...
Income Tax : ITAT quashed PCIT’s Section 263 order, holding AO’s treatment of survey income as business income valid and not erroneous or p...
Income Tax : Ahmedabad ITAT quashes reassessments based on ACB report, ruling the AO lacked independent "reason to believe" and only used borro...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune upholds PCIT's order u/s 263, setting aside an assessment for failure to verify ₹82.64 crore in advances for property...
Income Tax : National Chamber of Industries & Commerce, U.P has made a representation against Indiscriminate notices by the Income Tax Depa...
Income Tax : KSCAA has made a Representation on Challenges in Income Tax Related to Rectification Proceedings, Order Giving Effect, Delay in P...
Income Tax : One of the key sources of dispute is the existing arrangement for follow up on audit objections by Internal Audit Party and the Re...
Income Tax : The ITAT Amritsar held that a valuation report by itself cannot justify addition under Section 69 without evidence of extra paymen...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that amortization of BOT road project expenditure must be computed based on the actual concession period and not ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that the reassessment order could not be revised under Section 263 since the conditions for treating jewellery e...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that assessment orders passed pursuant to earlier remand directions were barred by limitation under Section 15...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT held that an Assessing Officer cannot make additions beyond the specific issues remanded by the Principal Commissioner ...
ITAT Bangalore held that reopening of assessment under section 148 after expiry of four years without failure on part of assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts is invalid and hence liable to be quashed.
ITAT Chennai dismisses FLsmidth’s appeal, upholding PCIT’s order for reassessment due to lack of verification by AO.
Bombay High Court upholds CIT’s revisional jurisdiction in KEC International’s tax dispute, dismissing the appeal on Section 115J and 32AB adjustments.
The assessee is into development and construction of a project. The case was selected for scrutiny and AO issued notices u/s 142(1) and 143(2) of the Act, calling for certain details.
PCIT observed that no agricultural activity was carried out from the year 2014 till 2018 in both the lands i.e. the agricultural land which was transferred by the assessee and also the land which was purchased by the assessee.
The issue involved in the present appeal relates to deduction of TDS in case of payment of External Development Charges [EDC]. Notably, TDS was not deducted by the assessee.
ITAT Kolkata quashes PCIT’s Section 263 revision, ruling that limited scrutiny cannot be expanded beyond its scope under the Income Tax Act.
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that revisionary proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act on the basis of audit objections raised by audit party justifiable since there was no verification done by AO during assessment proceedings.
Lease premium and other charges received by assessee on behalf of the Government of Maharashtra and the ownership of the land remained with the State Government. Assessee’s role was confined to the development and management of industrial areas.
Understanding the exclusion of time limits during Court stays in assessment proceedings under Finance Bill 2025 for Income Tax assessments.
