Income Tax : The article explains remedies available after adverse tax orders under scrutiny and reassessment. The key takeaway is that choosin...
Income Tax : The Court clarified that mere pendency of information exchange requests under DTAA cannot justify continuing a Look Out Circular. ...
Income Tax : A surge in Section 143(2) notices was triggered by the June 2025 limitation deadline. This explains why cases were picked and how ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that penalty under Section 271A cannot be levied merely because books were rejected and income was estimated. S...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that an assessment completed before receiving the DVO report under section 50C(2) is invalid. All additions and disa...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : Tribunal observed that the Assessing Officer failed to establish any mismatch in stock, sales, or accounting records before making...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that constituent members of a JV or Consortium can claim deduction under Section 80IA(4) when they actually ex...
Income Tax : The Tribunal found that full payment, TDS deduction, and transfer of possession established completion of the transaction for capi...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that cash deposits made during demonetization were fully supported by audited books of account, cash books, and b...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that purchases cannot be treated as bogus merely because the supplier failed to respond to a notice under ...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
Explore ITAT Mumbai’s interpretation on Section 80P(2)(d) deductions for Co-Op Societies on interest income from co-op banks, setting a precedent for future tax assessments.
In the case of Reliance Power Ltd vs. DCIT, Mumbai ITAT’s ruling clarifies disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that investments yielding exempt income should be considered for disallowance.
In the case of Rajesh Lakhmshi Nisar Vs ITO, Mumbai ITAT admitted additional evidence, emphasizing taxpayers shouldn’t be penalized for not submitting material evidence.
In the case of DCIT Vs Aarya Developers, ITAT Ahmedabad rules on the addition of on-money in the sale of house property, emphasizing the need for proper evidence and expert valuation.
In the case of Shiv Kumar Nayyar vs. DCIT, the Delhi ITAT nullified an addition of cash investment, citing lack of proper application of mind in proceedings.
Mere charging a nominal amount for smooth functioning of educational institution and trust could not called to be a part of commercial activity, and therefore, CIT(E) was directed to grant registration u/s 12AB to assessee.
ITAT Mumbai held that benefit of Article 13(4) of India Mauritius tax Treaty duly available to Mauritius registered assessee, having Tax Residency Certificate, for sale of shares which were acquired prior to 1st April 2017.
Analysis of Leelaben Kantilal Parekh Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) case discussing the validity of a reopening notice under section 148 and addition under section 69C for bogus purchases.
ITAT Mumbai held that initiation of reassessment proceedings on account of change of opinion formed on re-appraisal of the facts already on record and examined during the regular assessment proceedings is liable to be quashed.
ITAT Mumbai held that non-response to notice u/s. 133(6) of the Income Tax Act by some parties that does not prove that the entire transactions are bogus especially when all other documents to prove the identity and creditworthiness of the parties have been submitted
