This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Mumbai ITAT Admits Additional Evidence, Taxpayer Not Penalized for Non-Filing
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rajesh Lakhmshi Nisar Vs ITO - 32(3)(1) (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Rajesh Lakhmshi Nisar Vs ITO – 32(3)(1) (ITAT Mumbai)
Introduction: The case of Rajesh Lakhmshi Nisar vs. Income Tax Officer (ITO), heard at the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Mumbai, revolves around the dispute regarding the treatment of long-term capital gains (LTCG) on the sale of shares. The taxpayer contested the addition of LTCG by the assessing officer, claiming that the transactions were genuine and substantiated with evidence.
Detailed Analysis:
1. Background: The taxpayer, engaged in business activities, initially disclosed income from various sources in the return fil...




