Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Mumbai ITAT Admits Additional Evidence, Taxpayer Not Penalized for Non-Filing

Case Law Details

Case Name
Rajesh Lakhmshi Nisar Vs ITO - 32(3)(1) (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2014-15
Advertisement
Rajesh Lakhmshi Nisar Vs ITO – 32(3)(1) (ITAT Mumbai) Introduction: The case of Rajesh Lakhmshi Nisar vs. Income Tax Officer (ITO), heard at the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Mumbai, revolves around the dispute regarding the treatment of long-term capital gains (LTCG) on the sale of shares. The taxpayer contested the addition of LTCG by the assessing officer, claiming that the transactions were genuine and substantiated with evidence. Detailed Analysis: 1. Background: The taxpayer, engaged in business activities, initially disclosed income from various sources in the return fil...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *