Income Tax : Scrutiny assessment which is mainly governed by Section 143 of IT Act is in-depth process used by tax officers to ensure accuracy ...
Income Tax : In the alternate, assessee has also raised a ground that Assessing Officer ought to have allowed the expenditure incurred in culti...
Income Tax : Supreme Court disallows ₹10 crore bad debt deduction for Khyati Realtors Pvt Ltd, ruling it as capital expenditure, not eligible...
Income Tax : Understand the time limits for issuing income tax notices and completing assessments, including updates from the Finance Acts of 2...
Income Tax : Learn about rectifying mistakes in income tax orders under Section 154, including types of rectifiable orders, responsible authori...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore rules penalty under Section 271B cannot be levied for technical breach without malafide intention, in the case of C...
Income Tax : ITAT Chennai held that in view of pending decision before Madras High Court which has a bearing on the assessment, the assessment ...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata held that imposition of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act untenable without concealment of particulars of ...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that addition under section 68 towards unexplained income rightly deleted as no adverse incriminating material/ do...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashes penalty imposed on Sudesh Gupta under Section 271(1)(c) as omnibus notice without specifying the charge was inv...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
ITAT Mumbai held that notice issued u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act without specifying the particular limb is unsustainable in law. Accordingly, the penalty imposed u/s. 271(1)(c) is not sustainable.
ITAT Mumbai held that confirmation of addition u/s. 69A and 68 of the Income Tax Act without finding any fault with the evidence submitted justifying the transaction is totally unlawful and accordingly liable to be set aside.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that invocation of section 263 by PCIT unjustified due lack of sufficient evidence to support claim that the order is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that deduction under section 54 of the Income Tax Act towards Long Term Capital Gains admissible even when return is filed belated return of income under section 139(4) of the Income Tax Act.
AO was not justified in addition of interest expenses debited in the P&L account, a sum of Rs.2,12,94,836/- was capitalized towards CWIP under Section 36(1)(iii) of and added to the total income of the assessee.
ITAT Chennai held that the assessee is a cottage industry and the entire income is attributable to business of the society and hence eligible to claim Interest earned on deposit also as deduction U/s.80P(2)(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Jaipur held that dismissal of appeal by CIT(A) holding it to be barred by limitation unjustified as CIT(A) failed to consider that appeal was filed in physical form and filing of appeal is not delayed.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that advertisement expenditure claimed by the hospital has violated the provisions of Indian Medical Council Act 1956 professional conduct, Etiquette and Ethics Regulations, 2002. Hence, expenditure disallowed.
ITAT Raipur held that interest expenditure incurred for earning income chargeable under the head “Income from other sources” is allowable as deduction under section 57 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Cochin held that imposition of penalty u/s. 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act in consolidated manner is unjustified as AO has to point out each entry where such acceptance or repayment is Rs. 20,000/- or more.
