#section 143(3)
Log in to FollowLatest section 143(3) updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

Rule 11UA(2)(A) Doesn’t Mandate Valuation Report for NAV Method: Delhi ITAT

Effect of depreciation must be excluded for determining fair and true profit for purpose of TNMM: ITAT Kolkata

Jurisdiction assumed by AO at Mumbai invalid as assessee resided and carried profession at Bangalore: ITAT Mumbai

Revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 not invocable when AO takes one possible view: ITAT Delhi

ITAT Delhi allows Section 80IA deduction following rule of Consistency

TP adjustment towards brand development services deleted as no contract exists between the parties: ITAT Chennai

Addition u/s. 68 unsustainable as assessee duly discharged initial burden but AO failed to conduct independent inquires: ITAT Kolkata

Bank Account with Social Co-operative Insufficient to Imply Accommodation Entry: ITAT

Section 68 not apply to outgo or payment on account of expenditure

Presumption of Interest-Free Usage When Interest-Free & Interest-Bearing Funds Are Mixed

Failure to substantiate identity & fund source: Kolkata ITAT Remits Matter for Re-adjudication

Addition which is not based on reasons for reopening is un-sustainable sans notice u/s 148

Section 50(C)(2): If taxpayer objects to valuation, AO must refer valuation to valuation officer

Direction of DRP should be followed by TPO for calculation of TP adjustment: ITAT Kolkata
Explore the latest section 143(3) updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
