Income Tax : The article explains remedies available after adverse tax orders under scrutiny and reassessment. The key takeaway is that choosin...
Income Tax : The Court clarified that mere pendency of information exchange requests under DTAA cannot justify continuing a Look Out Circular. ...
Income Tax : A surge in Section 143(2) notices was triggered by the June 2025 limitation deadline. This explains why cases were picked and how ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that penalty under Section 271A cannot be levied merely because books were rejected and income was estimated. S...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that an assessment completed before receiving the DVO report under section 50C(2) is invalid. All additions and disa...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : Tribunal observed that the Assessing Officer failed to establish any mismatch in stock, sales, or accounting records before making...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that constituent members of a JV or Consortium can claim deduction under Section 80IA(4) when they actually ex...
Income Tax : The Tribunal found that full payment, TDS deduction, and transfer of possession established completion of the transaction for capi...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that cash deposits made during demonetization were fully supported by audited books of account, cash books, and b...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that purchases cannot be treated as bogus merely because the supplier failed to respond to a notice under ...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
Kerala High Court quashes re-assessment order under Income Tax Act, citing denial of virtual hearing due to formality. Read the detailed judgment.
In DCIT Vs Nilesh Shantilal Tank case, Mumbai ITAT confirms 12.5% gross profit margin on alleged bogus purchases as sales remain undisputed. Full text of the order included.
Kerala High Court ruling emphasizes time limits in Income Tax Act assessments on remand. Detailed analysis of Joseph Michael vs. DCIT case and its implications.
Discover how Chennai ITAT’s verdict affects assessments. Learn how a typographical error in Form 3CD impacts additions to an assessee’s income.
Detailed analysis of ITAT Ahmedabad’s order regarding CIT(A)’s authority to delete disallowance without considering AO’s findings under Income Tax Act, 1961.
Ahmedabad ITAT’s order in Atul Limited vs DCIT case discusses TP adjustments, volume discount, geography adjustments, and more. Detailed analysis provided.
In a detailed analysis of Axis Bank Limited Vs ACIT case, Ahmedabad ITAT explains the difference between a Letter of Credit and Corporate Guarantee, resolving disallowance disputes.
Understand the verdict of Vishakhapatnam ITAT on unexplained cash deposits. Detailed analysis on taxpayer’s explanation, legal provisions, and conclusions.
ITAT considered the justification provided by the assessee, which referenced KITCO and Reuters databases for determining transaction prices. However, the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) argued that the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) should be the primary source for estimating bullion trading prices.
ITAT held that if sales are not disputed and there is no discrepancy between purchases and declared sales, addition should be restricted to bring gross profit on alleged bogus purchases in line with other genuine purchases.
