Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : Understand the statutory time limits for issuing income-tax notices and completing assessments under the Income-tax Act. The guide...
Income Tax : Learn the updated provisions governing rectification, assessments, reassessments, and appeals under the Income-tax Act. This guide...
Income Tax : Learn how different types of income tax assessments are conducted under the Income-tax Act. The FAQs explain assessment procedures...
Income Tax : Section 154 permits rectification of mistakes apparent from the record in assessment orders, intimations, and TDS/TCS processing s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that additions made in an intimation under Section 143(1) cannot be disputed in an appeal against a scrutiny a...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held legal services are not FTS under Section 9(1)(vii) and directed partner-wise DTAA examination. FTS addition was de...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted a Section 69 addition after finding documentary evidence established joint ownership, source of funds, and ear...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment after finding no Section 143(2) notice and that the AO issued a final order disguised as a draft ...
Income Tax : ITAT Surat held that delayed filing of Form 10B is a procedural lapse and remanded the matter after directing the AO to consider t...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
ITAT Chennai held that reopening of assessment u/s. 148 of the Income Tax Act on mere change of opinion without satisfying necessary ingredients for initiating reassessment is invalid and liable to be quashed. Accordingly, reassessment set aside.
The Petitioner prayed for a direction upon the respondents not to proceed further on the basis of the notice u/s. 148 of the Act of 1961 and drop the proceedings after considering the objection dated 21.02.2022. Petitioner also prayed for an interim stay of the impugned notice.
Since the notice was issued under Section 148 in the name of a non-existing entity, despite the department having been intimated about the amalgamation much earlier, the impugned notice under Section 148 was null and void. Consequently, the reassessment order passed based on this invalid notice was quashed.
Assessee then filed an appeal before Tribunal. It was held that assessee had included net gain of ₹17.02 crore from foreign currency transactions and translations in its operating income, but DRP had rejected the claim.
ITAT Chennai held that passing of rectification order under section 154 of the Income Tax Act held to be not sustainable since reasonable opportunity of being heard was not granted specifically when rectification resulted into enhancement of an assessment.
ITAT Kolkata held that dividend distribution tax u/s 115-O of the Act and interest u/s 115P of the Income Tax Act is applicable only to a domestic company and since appellant is a co-operative society and provisions of section 115-O and 115-P will not be applicable.
ITAT Mumbai held that invocation of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act on account of difference of opinion is not sustainable in law. Accordingly, revision order passed by PCIT is liable to be quashed.
ITAT Raipur rules in favor of Asha Soni, vacating a Rs. 35 lakh unexplained cash credit. The court found that Section 68 additions cannot be made if no books of accounts are maintained.
ITAT Mumbai held that payments for roaming charges, being for automated services, do not fall under ambit of TDS provisions under Section 194C or 194J of Act.
In a significant ruling for taxpayers facing automated adjustments, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Pune Bench has directed the deletion of a disallowance made by the Central Processing Centre (CPC) under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The tribunal held that where a subsequent detailed scrutiny assessment by the Assessing Officer (AO) has considered and accepted the taxpayer’s contentions on the same issue, that decision takes precedence.
