This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Assessee could not apply under rule 46A- ITAT remands matter back to Addl./Jt. CIT(A)
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rajesh Kumar Dalmia Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Kolkata
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Rajesh Kumar Dalmia Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
In the abovementioned matter ITAT remanded the matter to AO after observing that assessee failed to apply under rule 46 A (Additional Evidence) of the IT Rules.
Assessee filed his return at ₹6,08,660/-. The case was selected for Scrutiny under “CASS” with thereason – “Abnormal increase in cash deposits during demonetization period. AO found that assessee had deposited specified Bank Notes (SBNs) to the tune of Rs 6,50,000/- during the period of demonetization which was treated as unexplained cash credits u/s R...
Author Info
