Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : Understand the statutory time limits for issuing income-tax notices and completing assessments under the Income-tax Act. The guide...
Income Tax : Learn the updated provisions governing rectification, assessments, reassessments, and appeals under the Income-tax Act. This guide...
Income Tax : Learn how different types of income tax assessments are conducted under the Income-tax Act. The FAQs explain assessment procedures...
Income Tax : Section 154 permits rectification of mistakes apparent from the record in assessment orders, intimations, and TDS/TCS processing s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that additions made in an intimation under Section 143(1) cannot be disputed in an appeal against a scrutiny a...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held legal services are not FTS under Section 9(1)(vii) and directed partner-wise DTAA examination. FTS addition was de...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted a Section 69 addition after finding documentary evidence established joint ownership, source of funds, and ear...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment after finding no Section 143(2) notice and that the AO issued a final order disguised as a draft ...
Income Tax : ITAT Surat held that delayed filing of Form 10B is a procedural lapse and remanded the matter after directing the AO to consider t...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
ITAT Indore held that retrospective cancellation of registration granted under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act invalid. Amendment brought in statute via Finance Act, 2022 is prospectively effective from 01.04.2022.
Higher profit per se cannot lead to the conclusion that there is arrangement between the parties. The concept of PLI cannot per se be applied to hold that assessee has earned higher profit
ITAT Delhi held that revision under section 263 of the Income Tax Act not justified as PCIT failed to demonstrate that assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Accordingly, revision order quashed.
Mumbai ITAT allows full depreciation for New Rampgreen Technologies, citing asset ownership date. It also voids the reassessment, holding that the tax audit report was already with the AO, preventing a ‘change of opinion’ based reopening.
AO however, held that STCG on the sale of rights entitlement was to be taxed as “sale of shares” under Article 13(5) of the India-Ireland DTAA, making an addition towards STCG as taxable in India.
The ITAT Delhi dismissed GE Steam Power Systems’ appeals for AY 2015-16 and 2016-17 after the company opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, allowing future revival if the settlement fails.
ITAT Kolkata held that filing of Form No. 67 is directory and no mandatory and the credit for foreign taxes cannot be denied for mere delay in filing the Form No. 67. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee allowed.
The Madras High Court has directed the Commissioner of Income Tax to grant a personal hearing and dispose of an appeal filed by Vadivelu Anbazhagan concerning an income tax demand of Rs. 8 lakh. The appeal for Assessment Year 2016-17 has been pending for over three years.
The ITAT Pune has set aside an income tax addition of Rs. 41 Lakh in demonetized notes for Dashrath Kisanrao, remanding the case to the AO for fresh verification of bank deposit certificates.
TAT Ahmedabad rules income from recorded sales, already taxed, cannot be re-added as unexplained cash credit for Dipakkumar Vyas, citing double taxation.
