Income Tax : The article explains remedies available after adverse tax orders under scrutiny and reassessment. The key takeaway is that choosin...
Income Tax : The Court clarified that mere pendency of information exchange requests under DTAA cannot justify continuing a Look Out Circular. ...
Income Tax : A surge in Section 143(2) notices was triggered by the June 2025 limitation deadline. This explains why cases were picked and how ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that penalty under Section 271A cannot be levied merely because books were rejected and income was estimated. S...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that an assessment completed before receiving the DVO report under section 50C(2) is invalid. All additions and disa...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : Tribunal observed that the Assessing Officer failed to establish any mismatch in stock, sales, or accounting records before making...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that constituent members of a JV or Consortium can claim deduction under Section 80IA(4) when they actually ex...
Income Tax : The Tribunal found that full payment, TDS deduction, and transfer of possession established completion of the transaction for capi...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that cash deposits made during demonetization were fully supported by audited books of account, cash books, and b...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that purchases cannot be treated as bogus merely because the supplier failed to respond to a notice under ...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
ITAT Kolkata rules that a PCIT cannot initiate a Section 263 revision based solely on an AO’s proposal without independent satisfaction, quashing the revisionary order.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that CIT(A)-NFAC has dismissed the appeal without rendering any findings on the merits of the case, which is against the principles of natural justice. Accordingly, order of CIT(A)-NFAC is set aside, and matter is restored to the file of CIT(A)-TP for fresh adjudication on merits.
ITAT Mumbai held that the Explanation to section 14A of the Income Tax Act inserted by the Finance Act, 2022 is prospective in nature and cannot be applied to assessment years preceding the amendment. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
ITAT Delhi held that the benefit of working capital adjustment while computing the ALP has also not been borne in mind hence matter restored to the file of TPO/ AO for fresh determination in accordance with law.
Bombay High Court held that if municipal rateable value doesn’t depict correct annual value, AO can make independent enquiry under section 23(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act and determine the sum which the property is reasonably expected to fetch for purpose of determining annual value u/s. 22.
The Madras High Court has dismissed an appeal by the Income Tax Department, affirming the quashing of reassessment proceedings against Siva Ventures Ltd. due to full disclosure by the assessee.
ITAT Ahmedabad allows an 83-year-old taxpayer to file a delayed appeal, citing health issues and a parallel case involving his wife, for which a precedent was set.
ITAT Chandigarh partially allows Sukh Pal Singh’s appeal, adjusting long-term capital gains by accepting a higher cost of acquisition and partial Section 54F deduction.
ITAT Pune held that addition towards bogus purchases adopting profit rate of 5% is justifiable since suppliers neither responded to notices issued u/s. 133(6) nor appeared before AO in response to summons issued u/s. 131.
ITAT Mumbai held that increasing book profits under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act on account of disallowance u/s. 14A read with rule 8D is not justifiable. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee allowed.
