ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata quashed the assessment as the jurisdictional Assessing Officer did not issue the mandatory notice under Section 143(2...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT deleted Section 40(a)(ia), notional interest, ICDS and Section 68 additions, citing Form 26A compliance and evident...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT remanded FD interest addition, directing verification of fund ownership and held Form 26AS alone is not determinati...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT held entire alleged bogus purchases cannot be added where sales are accepted, restricting the addition to 1.15% pro...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT held TP adjustments apply only to international AE transactions and upheld verified capacity, working capital and o...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
The ITAT Delhi has quashed a reassessment notice against Durga Agencies Pvt. Ltd., citing a procedural error where the notice lacked proper sanction from the specified authority under Section 151(ii).
Delhi ITAT upholds a ₹305 crore tax addition against Mallard Securities Pvt. Ltd., citing the company’s failure to prove the genuineness of cash credits.
Delhi ITAT deletes additions to NM Industries’ income, ruling that receipts from trade debtors cannot be taxed again as unexplained credits.
ITAT Delhi upheld CIT(A) order deleting additions on alleged bogus LTCG from Kailash Auto Finance shares, citing SEBI’s clean chit and lack of AO’s independent enquiry.
The ITAT Delhi has ruled that a tax reassessment against Upneet Singh Arneja for AY 2016-17 was invalid because it was initiated beyond the three-year limit with improper approval from a lower-ranking authority.
The ITAT Delhi has quashed income tax assessments for Tarun Gupta and others, citing a vague satisfaction note and the reliance on an unsigned agreement as grounds for invalidating the proceedings.
The Delhi ITAT upholds the deletion of a ₹9.84 crore addition, ruling that cash deposits during demonetisation were genuine sales. Suspicion cannot be substituted for evidence.
The ITAT Delhi deleted an addition for bogus purchases against Deepak Pawar. The tribunal ruled that since sales were accepted and purchases were supported by evidence, a profit estimation was invalid.
The ITAT Cochin confirmed a penalty under Section 271D for a taxpayer who accepted a large cash payment for property, ruling that ignorance of the law is not a reasonable cause.
The ITAT Delhi has deleted a ₹5.15 lakh tax addition for cash deposits during demonetization. The Tribunal ruled that the funds were explained by agricultural income and land sale proceeds.
