Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sandeep Aggarwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sandeep Aggarwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Summary: The Delhi ITAT deleted the addition made under Section 69A on account of alleged unexplained jewellery purchases based solely on WhatsApp chats recovered during a search conducted in the case of the Pilot Industries Group. The Assessing Officer had treated certain WhatsApp conversations between the assessee, his wife, and jewellers as evidence of cash purchases of jewellery aggregating to ₹82.10 lakh and made additions under Section 69A. The CIT(A) partly confirmed the addition to the extent of ₹31.70 lakh after interpreting some chats as indi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Ajay Kumar Agrawal FCA, a science graduate and fellow chartered accountant in practice for over 26 years. Ajay has been in continuous practice mainly in corporate consultancy, litigation in the field of Direct and Indirect laws, Regulatory Law, and commercial law beside the Auditing of corporate and View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Can Updated Return Be Filed After Notice Under Sections 143(2), 148A or 148? Gross Receipts Cannot Be Taxed if Charitable Expenditure Was Undisputed: ITAT Delhi ITAT Grants TDS Credit Despite Employer’s Failure to Deposit Tax with Government ITAT Deletes Section 270A Penalty as Estimated Addition Cannot Justify Penalty ITAT Deletes Bogus Purchase Addition as AO Failed to Disprove Documentary Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930