This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Customs Valuation Difference Alone Cannot Prove Undisclosed Purchases: ITAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Shivprakash S Chandak (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015–16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ACIT Vs Shivprakash S Chandak (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Remands Addition on Alleged Unrecorded Imports Because Customs Assessable Value Was Not Properly Examined; Addition Under Section 69C Sent Back After ITAT Finds Incomplete Verification of Import Transactions; Gross Profit Addition on Unrecorded Imports Requires Verification of Stock and Corresponding Sales; ITAT Questions Basis of Peak Addition in Case Involving Alleged Out-of-Book Imports; Section 69C Addition Reopened After ITAT Finds Customs and Purchase Data Not Properly Reconciled; ITAT Remands Case Because Customs As...




