ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata quashed the assessment as the jurisdictional Assessing Officer did not issue the mandatory notice under Section 143(2...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT deleted Section 40(a)(ia), notional interest, ICDS and Section 68 additions, citing Form 26A compliance and evident...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT remanded FD interest addition, directing verification of fund ownership and held Form 26AS alone is not determinati...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT held entire alleged bogus purchases cannot be added where sales are accepted, restricting the addition to 1.15% pro...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT held TP adjustments apply only to international AE transactions and upheld verified capacity, working capital and o...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Ahmedabad deleted an income addition and penalty on a taxpayer, accepting her explanation that cash deposits came from her husband and brother.
The ITAT Delhi deleted income additions on alleged bogus loans and donations, ruling that a defective sanction for reopening an assessment beyond four years invalidates the entire proceeding.
ITAT Delhi deleted a ₹10.75 crore addition on old unsecured loans, ruling that tax authorities cannot tax existing liabilities as fresh income without evidence of bogus transactions.
The ITAT Kolkata deleted an addition under Section 69 and a tax addition under Section 56(2), ruling that a taxpayer’s salary account was a valid source for property investment.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that bad debts written off as irrecoverable in books is enough and it is not necessary to demonstrate that a debt has become bad. Accordingly, addition on account of bad debts liable to be deleted.
The ITAT Ahmedabad accepted a developer’s project completion accounting method, deleting a Rs. 2.24 crore addition made by the AO for alleged profit suppression.
ITAT Chandigarh directs the Assessing Officer to verify if the assessee paid a portion of GST before the return due date to allow deduction under Section 43B.
ITAT Delhi rules that cash deposits made during demonetization from recorded cash sales are not unexplained income, deleting an addition under Section 68.
The ITAT Delhi deleted a Rs. 3.36 crore addition for bogus sundry creditors, ruling that the addition was invalid as the assessee’s purchases and sales were not disputed.
The ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue’s appeals against Asian Consolidated Industries, upholding the CIT(A)’s decision to allow deductions and reject the application of Section 44AD.
