Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajendra Bhalchandra Mokashi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Rajendra Bhalchandra Mokashi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai held that addition foisted upon the assessee in injudicious manner by the lower authority demonstrates lack of requisite care and caution since neither the initiation of reassessment proceedings nor the consequent addition was warranted.

Facts- Case of assessee was thus taken up for reopening u/s. 147 r.w.s. 148. AO observed that on going through the reply of the assessee, his contentions are not acceptable since in Form 26AS, he found that Rs.66,02,464/- is credited against the PAN of the assesse

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031