ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata quashed the assessment as the jurisdictional Assessing Officer did not issue the mandatory notice under Section 143(2...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT deleted Section 40(a)(ia), notional interest, ICDS and Section 68 additions, citing Form 26A compliance and evident...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT remanded FD interest addition, directing verification of fund ownership and held Form 26AS alone is not determinati...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT held entire alleged bogus purchases cannot be added where sales are accepted, restricting the addition to 1.15% pro...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT held TP adjustments apply only to international AE transactions and upheld verified capacity, working capital and o...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Patna upholds the deletion of a ₹4.98 crore addition, ruling that purchases are not bogus just because suppliers failed to file returns or respond to tax notices.
ITAT Pune sends a tax case back to the CIT(A), stressing that an assessment on a deceased person is legally invalid. The Tribunal ruled the CIT(A) must first decide on this jurisdictional issue.
The ITAT Cuttack ruled that additions cannot be made for completed assessments without incriminating material found during a search, upholding the principle from the Abhisar Buildwell case.
A summary of the ITAT Patna ruling in Sushila Sultania’s case, where the tribunal deleted a tax addition for long-term capital gains.
A summary of the ITAT Ahmedabad ruling on Roshniben Sumanlal Kapadia’s case, where the tribunal upheld an addition for bogus share trades.
The ITAT Ahmedabad set aside an ex-parte order against Shahnawaz Mustakkhan Pathan, ruling that the CIT(A) violated natural justice by sending hearing notices via email despite the assessee’s explicit request not to use that method. The case is now sent back for a fresh hearing.
ITAT Ahmedabad deletes a tax addition on Pushpakant Punjalal Chokshi, ruling that cash deposits in an HUF account can’t be taxed in an individual’s hands.
The ITAT Ahmedabad deleted a ₹10.61 lakh penalty against Snehalkumar Bhogilal Trivedi, ruling that a notice citing both under-reporting and misreporting of income was void due to ambiguity.
ITAT Raipur rules that mechanical or “rubber-stamp” approvals under Section 153D are invalid, requiring the approving authority to apply independent mind and provide case-specific reasoning.
ITAT Bangalore deletes an income tax addition for Maloo Constructions, ruling that purchases were not bogus despite a third-party report. The decision emphasizes that disallowances require more than mere suspicion and must be supported by independent inquiry.
