Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Geetadevi Jabararam Purohit Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Geetadevi Jabararam Purohit Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) In this case , the ITAT Mumbai dealt with additions made under Section 69 based on alleged cash payments (“on-money”) for purchase of commercial property, arising from a search in the Rubberwala Group. The AO made additions relying solely on third-party statements and excel sheet data seized from the developer group, alleging that the assessee paid cash over and above the agreement value. The assessee consistently denied any such payment and argued that no incriminating material was found from her possession, nor were the relied-upon statem...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Technical Glitch in Form 26A Filing Cannot Trigger Section 40(a)(ia) Disallowance: ITAT Bangalore Form 26AS Alone Cannot Decide Taxability of FD Interest: ITAT Bangalore Entire Bogus Purchases Not Taxable If Sales Accepted; Only Profit Taxable: ITAT Bangalore Bangalore ITAT Reaffirms that Transfer Pricing Adjustment Must Be Restricted Only to International Transactions with AEs Reassessment Quashed as New Allegations Exceeded Section 148A Proceedings: Karnataka HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031