Goods and Services Tax : GST IMS allows taxpayers to accept, reject or keep invoices pending before ITC flows to GSTR-3B, ensuring better GST ITC reconcili...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court ruled that GST authorities must mandatorily apply Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST before disallowing ITC due to return...
Goods and Services Tax : The court held that Section 74 cannot be used unless fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression with intent to evade tax is specif...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn why GSTR-2B, 2A, and books differ, how mismatches occur, and the steps founders must take to claim ITC correctly and stay au...
Goods and Services Tax : How AI-powered tools streamline GSTR-2A & GSTR-2B reconciliation for Chartered Accountants. Learn about automated GST reconciliati...
Goods and Services Tax : Recent amendments in GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C have increased compliance complexity, prompting calls for extended deadlines to allow accu...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN – Upcoming changes/initiatives:- ♦ SMS based NIL Return filing for GSTR-3B and GSTR-1. ♦ Improvements in GSTR-2A to sho...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. Certain notified taxpayers have been issuing invoices after obtaining Invoice Reference Number (IRN) from Invoice Registration ...
Goods and Services Tax : Direct Taxes Professionals’ Association requested Hon’ble Finance Minister to allow filing of GSTR 9, 9A and 9C for the F.Y. 2...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN enables taxpayers to know Input Tax Credit (ITC) eligibility at invoice level while filing Annual Return – Taxpayers ar...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court quashed ex-parte GST adjudication orders after the taxpayer claimed it could explain discrepancies betwee...
Goods and Services Tax : The case involved denial of input tax credit solely due to return mismatch without examining records. The Court held that such mec...
Goods and Services Tax : The court addressed denial of input tax credit due to mismatch with GSTR-2A and missing invoices. It allowed the taxpayer to seek ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court held that passing two assessment orders for the same GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B mismatch leads to duplication and d...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court quashed a GST demand where part of the liability arose from belated ITC and part from return mismatch, directing fr...
Goods and Services Tax : Read Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST from CBIC regarding the clarification on availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) in GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A ...
Goods and Services Tax : Clarification to deal with difference in Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed in FORM GSTR-3B as compared to that detailed in FORM GSTR-...
Goods and Services Tax : It has been noticed that in a few cases, certain records are not reflected in GSTR-2B statement for the period of April 2022. Howe...
Goods and Services Tax : Condition made under sub-rule (4) of rule 36 of the CGST Rules shall apply cumulatively for the tax period February, March, April,...
Goods and Services Tax : The GST Council, in its 39th meeting held on 14th March 2020, had recommended to adopt and implement the incremental approach of...
How AI-powered tools streamline GSTR-2A & GSTR-2B reconciliation for Chartered Accountants. Learn about automated GST reconciliations for seamless GST compliance.
Petitioner is a Pvt. Ltd. Company and registered with GST department. Petitioner was an authorized dealer of Ford India Pvt. Ltd. and was engaged in selling of motor cars, vehicle and part thereof and their repair and services.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that physical verification of business premises for GST purposes must occur in the presence of the concerned person and requires proper witness documentation.
Allahabad HC: Filing a certified copy of the appealed GST order is a procedural requirement, not mandatory if the appeal is filed electronically with a copy.
Madras HC sets aside GST order against DS Engineering, ordering a rehearing after 10% tax deposit. Dispute over GSTR 3B/2A mismatch.
Madras High Court remands ITC claim, orders partial deposit, and grants new objection chance in Chinnadurai Saravanan vs Deputy State Tax Officer case.
Analyzing GST Waiver Scheme under Section 128A—Did it provide relief or reward non-compliance? Key issues, challenges, and implications for taxpayers.
FY 2024-25 saw numerous GST audits and SCNs, creating compliance hurdles. Retrospective demands and procedural issues challenged businesses.
Madras High Court sets aside a GST demand order due to improper service, remanding the case with a condition to deposit 25% of the disputed tax.
Madras HC quashes GST order against Ragul Industries, allowing new evidence for GSTR 3B/2A/1 mismatches, subject to 25% tax deposit.
