Goods and Services Tax : Ambiguity under Section 112(8)(b) of the CGST Act has created confusion over GSTAT pre-deposit calculations after reduction of tax...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT directed service through registered post/speed post after notices sent via portal and email failed to receive any effective ...
Goods and Services Tax : Taxpayers and professionals are facing multiple procedural doubts regarding GSTAT appeal filing requirements, including affidavits...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT के नए आदेश के अनुसार सभी लंबित और नई अपीलें पहले...
Goods and Services Tax : The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that Customs authorities are responsible for levy and assessment of IGST on imported goods. The...
CA, CS, CMA : ICAI has recommended mandatory verification of the Certificate of Practice for Chartered Accountants appearing before GSTAT to ens...
Goods and Services Tax : A representation has urged reconsideration of GSTAT Procedure Rules requiring all relied-upon documents to be filed with the appea...
Goods and Services Tax : A tax bar body has sought reduction of GSTAT appeal and application fees, citing affordability concerns. The key takeaway is that ...
Goods and Services Tax : यह कि जीएसटी के अंतर्गत अपीलीय ट्रिब्यूनल ट्रिब...
Goods and Services Tax : Issues ranging from mandatory declarations to certification and translation requirements have been flagged. The core message is th...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT held that failure to pass on additional Input Tax Credit benefits to eligible homebuyers violated Section 171 of the CGST Ac...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court held that once the GST Appellate Tribunal became operational and timelines were extended, disputes should be pursued thr...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging GST registration cancellation after noting the availability of...
Goods and Services Tax : The Tribunal allowed service of notice through registered post and speed post after no response was received regarding verificatio...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT upheld anti-profiteering findings after the developer accepted the DGAP report concerning ITC benefits in a housing project....
Goods and Services Tax : The GST Appellate Tribunal issued a detailed order constituting benches across India and classifying GST disputes into three categ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Principal Bench of GSTAT instructed scrutiny officers not to raise defects where appellants upload required soft copy document...
Goods and Services Tax : The Central Government has authorized the GSTAT Principal Bench, New Delhi, to hear appeals under Section 101B of the CGST Act. Th...
Goods and Services Tax : The government has appointed 22 Judicial Members as Vice Presidents of GSTAT benches. The move aims to improve efficiency and stre...
Goods and Services Tax : Goa notifies 30 June 2026 as deadline to file GST Appellate Tribunal appeals for orders communicated before 1 April 2026 under Sec...
The GST Appellate Tribunal held that the profiteering amount must exclude benefits already passed on to home buyers. The respondent was directed to refund the net amount with interest to eligible buyers within three months.
The Tribunal accepted the DGAP report after the complainant failed to appear despite confirmed receipt of the hearing notice. The ruling shows that proceedings may be concluded when a complainant does not participate.
The tribunal accepted the investigation report finding no savings in pre- and post-GST credit ratios. With complainants settling disputes and withdrawing complaints, the proceedings were closed.
The GST Appellate Tribunal remanded the case to the DGAP after the respondent admitted that incorrect figures were earlier submitted. The Tribunal directed reinvestigation under Rule 133(4) without examining the merits.
The High Court disposed of the writ petition after the constitution of the GST Appellate Tribunal, permitting the taxpayer to file a statutory appeal. The ruling clarifies that writ jurisdiction need not continue once the appellate forum is operational.
High Courts are declining to entertain GST writs now that GSTAT is operational. Taxpayers must pursue statutory appeals, with courts granting limited transition relief to avoid hardship.
The Tribunal accepted the anti-profiteering report after the respondent agreed to pay ₹67.02 crore to eligible homebuyers. The ruling directs payment within three months along with applicable interest, closing the dispute through an undertaking.
The Tribunal held that allegations of profiteering were not substantiated after detailed verification of records and returns. It concluded that GST liabilities were duly discharged and the complaint was liable to be dropped.
The tribunal remanded the matter after the respondent admitted incorrect figures were submitted earlier, directing reinvestigation so that profiteering is recalculated on correct data.
The tribunal held that failure to reduce ticket prices after a GST rate cut amounted to profiteering and upheld recovery of the excess amount. The ruling clarifies that tax benefits must be passed on through commensurate price reduction.
