Goods and Services Tax : The article explains that the Statement of Facts forms the foundation of every GST appeal. It emphasizes that accurate, evidence-b...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT offers broader powers than the First Appellate Authority but faces challenges relating to pre-deposit, timelines, and digita...
Goods and Services Tax : The article explains that GSTAT can condone delay only within the statutory extension under the CGST Act, unlike CESTAT....
Goods and Services Tax : The Government has extended the deadline for filing eligible GSTAT appeals to 31 July 2026. The extension applies only to specifie...
Goods and Services Tax : The GSTAT committee proposed digital filing, relaxed certified copy requirements, and longer defect rectification timelines to str...
Goods and Services Tax : The representation requests extension of the GSTAT appeal filing deadline to 31 December 2026, citing persistent technical issues ...
Goods and Services Tax : A representation seeks extension of the GSTAT appeal filing deadline to 31 December 2026, citing persistent technical issues on th...
Goods and Services Tax : The Advocates Tax Bar Association has requested extension of the GSTAT appeal filing deadline to 31 December 2026, citing persiste...
Goods and Services Tax : The GSTAT Bar Association has urged CBIC to extend the GST Tribunal appeal deadline due to persistent technical glitches on the GS...
Goods and Services Tax : A GST Bar Association has sought a three-month extension for filing GSTAT appeals, citing procedural complexities and evolving fil...
Goods and Services Tax : The Gauhati High Court held that sufficient cause for delay may be explained in the memorandum of appeal itself. It ruled that an ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Telangana High Court declined to entertain the writ petition because the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) is now functional and ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Telangana High Court refused to entertain a writ petition challenging a GST appellate order due to delay and the availability ...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT held that retaining the same ticket prices after GST reductions amounted to profiteering under Section 171 of the CGST Act. ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court held that writ petitions need not continue once the GSTAT becomes operational and statutory appeal timelines are availab...
Goods and Services Tax : The Government has fixed 31 July 2026 as the last date for filing GST Appellate Tribunal appeals and applications in specified old...
CA, CS, CMA : KSCAA has urged the Government to extend the GSTAT appeal filing deadline by three months, citing technical glitches, procedural a...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT instructed scrutiny officers not to raise defects where appellants have uploaded the required documents in prescribed form. ...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT Mumbai Bench has officially commenced functioning, making it mandatory for taxpayers within its jurisdiction to file appeals...
Goods and Services Tax : The Committee recommended replacing daily cause lists with weekly schedules and permitting supplementary lists when necessary. The...
A tax bar body has sought reduction of GSTAT appeal and application fees, citing affordability concerns. The key takeaway is that high costs may defeat the purpose of a statutory appellate forum.
The Tribunal held that where the input tax credit ratio reduced in the post-GST period, no additional benefit accrued to the developer. Consequently, no profiteering under Section 171 was established.
The Tribunal held that increasing base prices after a GST rate reduction defeated the statutory mandate of Section 171. Profiteering was confirmed as the benefit of tax reduction was not passed on to consumers.
यह कि जीएसटी के अंतर्गत अपीलीय ट्रिब्यूनल ट्रिब्यूनल की स्थापना हो चुकी है ।तथा करदाता और टैक्स प्रोफेशनल ट्रिब्यूनल में अपील फाइल कर रहे हैं। लेकिन कई समस्याएं उत्पन्न हो रही है जिसका कारण जीएसटी अपीलीय ट्रिब्यूनल का पोर्टल सही तरीके से कार्य नहीं कर रहा है । इसके संबंध में श्री हर्ष शर्मा ,एडवोकेट ,संस्थापक […]
The case examined whether a cinema operator passed on the GST reduction on ticket prices. The Tribunal held that maintaining the same cum-tax prices by increasing base prices amounted to profiteering under Section 171.
Issues ranging from mandatory declarations to certification and translation requirements have been flagged. The core message is that early corrections can prevent long-term litigation hurdles.
The Tribunal held that no profiteering arose where the ITC-to-cost ratio declined after GST. The key takeaway is that absence of GST-led savings defeats section 171 allegations.
GSTAT upheld that the benefit of GST reduction from 28% to 18% was not passed on to consumers and directed recovery of ₹19.32 lakh as profiteering, to be deposited in Consumer Welfare Funds.
The High Court held that once the GST Appellate Tribunal is functional and timelines are notified, disputes must be pursued through the statutory appeal route, subject to mandatory pre-deposit requirements.
CBIC has operationalised capacity-based excise duty on specified tobacco goods from February 2026. The update outlines declarations, monthly filings, inspections, and abatement rules.
