Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

CA Sandeep Kanoi

CA Sandeep Kanoi01.10.2015- 12.20 PM- CBDT finally extended due date all over India to 31.10.2015 – Click to Read

01.10.2015- 11.50- It seems CBDT has extended due date all over India to 31.10.2015. Pleas Read- Extension of Due Date to 31.10.2015 all over India?

01.10.2015 -9.15 AM  Read Our article titled- Extension of due Date to 31.10.2015- Who can take benefit and FAQs

30.09.2015- 08.15 PM-  Check Copy of Orissa High Court Judgment in the case of Jagdish Prasad Mittal Vs.  Union of India. Click here to View Judgment Copy

30.09.2015 6.45 PM Bombay High Court Instructed CBDT to extend due date to 31.10.2015- Click here to View Judgment Copy

Bombay HC criticises CBDT move of extending of ITR due date for only two states & one Union territory & extended due date to 31.10.2015

30.09.2015- 4.30 PM CBDT rejects KSCAA representation which Karnataka HC instructed to Consider

30.09.2015-  4.20 PM Download Order of Karnataka High Court (Dharwad Bench) in the case of Chandramappa Ramanna  Dhavalagi  Vs Union of India, WP 110253/2015- Click Here

30.09.2015- 3.30 PM CBDT Extends date for Punjab, Haryana, Gujarat and for Union Territory of Chandigarh. – CBDT extends date only in Punjab, Haryana, UT of Chandigarh and Gujarat

30.09.2015- 1.30 PM Copy of Gujarat High Court Order Available for Download. We will upload analysis also soon. Detailed Status of Writ filed in Gujarat High Court

30.09.2015-  12.15 PM Orissa High Court has also followed the Judgments of Gujarat and Punjab & Haryana High Court and instructed CBDT to extend due date  to 31.10.2015. 

30.09.2015-8 AM- As per news with us CBDT is expected to issue a Press Release /Order today Clarifying their stand on instruction of Hon’ble Punjab and Gujarat High Court. Further we have not received any official or non official confirmation from any reliable source regarding filing of Appeal by CBDT in supreme court against the High Court Orders.

We would also like to inform you that as per information with CBDT has also not yet acted on instruction of Karnataka High court Judgment in which Hon’ble high court has asked it Consider ICAI representation and decide accordingly.

In this article we have summarised the status of Writ Petition filed against non extension of Due date of Tax Audit and Income Tax Return (ITR) filing for cases covered under Tax Audit Provisions, filed in various High Courts All over India. Till Date as per our information Writs been filed in Gujarat, Delhi, Jodhpur, Karnataka, Orrisa, Mumbai, Calcutta, Madras, Andhra Pradesh & Telangana  and in Punjab & Haryana High Court.

Detailed Status of various writs filed in High Courts is as under-

S.

No.

Case Details High Court Latest Status Link for Detailed Status
1. All Gujarat Federation of Tax Consultants vs. CBDT, Special Civil Application No. 15075 Of 2015, Dated-15.09.2015 Gujarat High Court Directed CBDT to Extend due date to 31.10.2015+ Order Copy Available.
Detailed Status of Writ filed in Gujarat High Court

 

2. Karnataka State Chartered Accountant Society (KSCAA) & Ors vs Union of India & Ors, Writ Petition (WP)  41109/2015, 41110/2015 Karnataka High Court Karnataka high court directed CBDT to consider representation of KSCAA Detailed update of Writ filed in Karnataka High Court
3. Chandramappa Ramanna  Dhavalagi  Vs Union of India, WP 110253/2015 Karnataka High Court (Dharwad Bench) 29.09.2015- HC  disposes petition and  directs CBDT to consider representation submitted by ICAI for extension of due date. Detailed update of Writ filed in Karnataka High Court + Order Copy dated 29.09.2015
4. Vishal Garg & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Anr., CWP- 19770 -2015, Dated- 15.09.2015 Punjab & Haryana High Court Directed CBDT to Extend due date to 31st October 2015+ Order Copy Detailed update of Writ filed in Punjab & Haryana High Court

 

5. The Chamber of Tax Consultants Vs. Union of India & Ors., WP 2764/2015, Filed on 22.09.2015 Bombay High Court

Bombay HC criticises CBDT move of extending of ITR due date for only two states & one Union territory & extended due date to 31.10.2015

Detailed Status of Writ filed in Bombay High Court + Order Copy
6. Devendra Kumar Somani & Ors Vs. Union of India,  Civil Writ No. 10974 of 2015, Dated-21.09.2015 Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur 29.09.2015- Case dismissed following the judgment of division bench of the same High Court
Detailed Status of Writ filed in Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur by Devnedra Somani
7. Jagdish Prasad Mittal Vs.  Union of India, Writ Petition No. WP(C)-17178/2015, Date- 21/09/2015

 

Orissa High Court 30.09.2015- Instructed CBDT to extend due date to 31.10.2015. Detailed update of Writ filed in Orrisa High Court + Copy of Order

 

8. V. Nagendra Prasad, Hyd & Another Vs Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, New Delhi & 2 Others, WP 30289/2015, Date of Filing 15.09.2015 Hyderabad High Court 28.09.2015- Adjourned to 05.10.2015

 

Detailed update of Writ filed in Hyderabad High Court
9. Rajasthan Tax Consultants Association & Anr Vs. Union Of India & Anr, CIVIL WRIT NO. 11037 of 2015 , Dated -22.09.2015 Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur Writ dismissed. Detailed Status of Writ filed in Rajasthan HC by RTCA
10. V. K. Tulsyan & Co. Vs UOI, WP No.1187 of 2015, Date of Filing- 24.09.2015 Calcutta High Court Hearing has not taken place, case adjourned to 01.10.2015 Detailed update of Writ filed in Calcutta High Court
11. Avinash Gupta V/s Union of India and Ors ,W.P.(C)  9032/2015 Delhi High Court On 21.09.2015 High Court heard the writ and issued Instruction to CBDT for timely release of Return Forms. Case Heard and dismissed Detailed Status of Writ filed in Delhi High Court

Analysis of Judgment –Landmark Judgment by Delhi HC- ITR/TAR Due Date- No Extension but direction to issue ITR forms on time

12. Avinash Gupta and Ors V/s Union of India and Ors, WP(C.) of 8771 of 2015 Delhi High Court Dismissed by High Court as in opinion of High Court writ should have been filed as PIL. Case Heard. Detailed update of Writ filed in Delhi High Court

 

Some Other Relevant Events

28.09.2015
27.09.2015
22.09.2015 ICAI Meeting with FM: No Concrete Decision on TAR/ITR Date
14.09.2015 ICAI requests FM to extend Due date of ITR & Tax Audit Report
09.09.2015 CBDT issued a press release and informed that there will be No extension of Tax Audit Due date for AY 2015-16.
10.07.2015 ICAI requests CBDT for extension of due date of Income Tax Return Filing for A.Y. 2015-16

Some Relevant Articles written by Our Eminent Authors:-

Demand for extension of Tax Audit Due Date: A Practical Permanent Solution CA Satish Sarda
Poem on delayed ITRs and Non extension of TAR due dateCA Dilip Khetan
Non Extension of Date of Tax Audits & Company Audits – Adamant Views of FM & CBDT – CA Rekha Dhamankar
TAR Due Date- Request to FM to take note of CBDT wrong doingCA Amresh Vashisht
Why Extension Is Required For Tax Audit Report CA Sudhir Halakhandi

(Above news is compiled by CA Sandeep Kanoi based on information from various sources. We will keep updating this space with further updates on daily basis. )

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

1,254 Comments

  1. RAVI says:

    Date ni bada rahe CBDT wale no problem we can manage, bus ab aage jaise individual ki badayi thi waise future mai koi bhi date badane se rokna hoga, ab chahe kuch b ho kisi b case m date ni badayegi future mai cbdt, cbdt ko iss type ki b press release karni chahiye aaj

  2. shrenik jain says:

    CHEERS for TAX PAYERS FROM THE STATE OF FINANCE MINISTER & PRIME MINISTER. DOESNT MATTER ATLEAST SOME WILL LOSE And Some will GAIN. We the losers will make the government pay for this partiality

  3. sanjay says:

    After reading KSCAA rejection order, it comes to know that, if salaried employees or small business peoples file return without the help of C.A., then due to no knowledge of Tax laws and sections will CBDT will help us from harassment from income tax authorities.

  4. shrenik jain says:

    both the circulars u/s 119 of Income Tax Act 1961 for P& H and Gujarat are different but bear the same circular no.F.No.225/207/2016/ITA.II

  5. V.Singh says:

    PM Modi wants to make INDIA as Digital India but Finance Minister is partial in extending Tax audit filing date. Height of Stupidity. CBDT what is going on !

  6. VK Subramani says:

    It is unfortunate that the CBDT is not learning the merits of the case in spite of so many high court decisions. Now the trade bodies have to step in to put pressure on the Government so that the CBDT will understand that it cannot be too rigid by taking it as a prestige issue.

  7. Lokesh Kumar says:

    I request all of you to kindly visit the following link and write to PM
    pgportal.gov.in/pmocitizen/Grievancepmo.aspx.

    If each of us write to him , may be PM will listen to us.

  8. SATISH SHARMA says:

    As present the CBDT has extended date for filing of income tax up to 31.10.2015 for Gujrat, Haryna, Punjab and Chandigarh only. What type of decesion CBDT take. Rules, Regulations and Laws should be one for all whether it is Assam or it is any other state of India. Finance Ministry should pay attention on these things.

  9. NIKHIL RAHEJA says:

    Whats going on??. Are we professionals fools. Do we have to file writ petitions in all 29 states to get extension of the due date in all of india. Utter Nonsense. Does a high court order not binding for the whole of India?? If the department keeps on justifying the need for completing tax audits within 23 days, are they very efficient in closing all the pending cases lying before them? The Department interest calculations cannot change but the CA software update should change within a week. Pretty Strange and Disgusting. Very disappointed with the government. Not expected when the PM says we are working for the business community at large.

  10. swaminathan.s says:

    Sir,
    what happend to all states whether chennai tamilnadu has gone any writ and it is pending with court what is the status and whether we will get any extension.

  11. Panneerselvam says:

    I am very disappointed.I am very sorry to taxpayers and CAs all over India except some states. The ICAI and its office bearers are sleeping over this issue. The FM and CBDT are very adamant in this regard.This kind of approach will give them bad name.

  12. Lokesh Kumar says:

    CBDT’s Decision to extend the ITR date in only States of Gujarat, Punjab & Haryana and UT of Chandigarh is going to divide the country furthermore on basis of regions and petitioners.
    From now onwards What is applicable in one state will not be applicable for other states. The Government will need to clarify for each and every order they issue,hereafter whether its relevant to which region and not applicable to which region.
    No need of Political parties, CBDT is doing their role of dividing the country

  13. Shekhar Athalye says:

    CBDT had logical & rational options. A) It could have got stay from supreme court before 30th September. B) It could have extended time till the matter is finally decided by SC.But stating that the notification is subject to appellate decision is utterly nonsense. It means that if SC reverses the HC decision on say 10th Oct. the return filed on 1st Oct is delayed return. In other words the Notification is not worth the paper it is printed on. Trying to avoid contempt charge it committed more grave, seriou & stupid contempt. Is CBDT ruled by people of such calibre?

  14. ADV. SANJAYKUMAR THAKKAR says:

    So it means that when we are arguing in appeals we have to rely on judgements of jurisdictional CIT (a), ITAT and HC hence forth.

  15. bk says:

    Finance Ministry officials should be sacked. Income Tax Laws are for entire country. We should debate whether India should be one or it should be Union of Independent countries

  16. Basavaraj says:

    Hi People, file all your IT returns by 31.10.2015, don’t worry change the address for correspondence to Punjab and Haryana States for one month only.

  17. Sharad Varshney says:

    This is a foolish decision by CBDT. I think they are egoist persons who have lost their conscience and taking decisions which are arbitrary and unjust. We should unite and fight with these types of autocratic bodies.

  18. Girish Gogte says:

    Personally I feel that there can not be a more mockery of a nationwide issue raised across the geography of the country in various highcourts than what CBDT has done. Income Tax Return and Income Tax audit is a Union subject and not state subject.
    On the other hand the Bombay HC stated that once a HC rules under Article 226 then the same is binding on all HC – indicating that all the HC would mostly come up with similar directives.
    Is it an intentional delay tactic or ego of some persons from CBDT to get as many returns filed as possible, simply ignoring the stress it is causing on the auditor/auditee involved or is it a simple ignorance of the concept of fairness ?
    Truly frustrating

  19. Madhu Sharma says:

    Ironically only the states of PM & FM exempted. Is it just a coincidence ? whatever its unfortunate to discriminate people of state to another.

  20. Rajesh Sehgal says:

    Regionalism decision rather than unionism decision required from CBDT.
    Afsarshahi is desh se nahi ja sakti dekho majak Honable courts order ka only for Punjab,Haryana.Chandigarh,Gujarat baki Bharat Varsh me tax payers nahi hai kya.

  21. Ram Ram India says:

    Honestly no point in staying in India and then begging for small issues, instead let leaders visit us in other countries and ask us to invest here.

  22. Mehta says:

    This is ridiculuous….forgetting petty differences everyone should get together against such type of handling of important issues.
    what wrong other state assessees have done..
    this order is also with rider of CBDT going for appeal…is this a joke..
    Now CA’s,associations of every states should go agianst CBDT,
    as there are genuine hardships for filing TAR and returns.
    Stand United.
    Stop Work…Dont Upload anything

  23. Rohith says:

    Mr.Sandeep Kanoi,

    What about rest of India?

    Whats happening really confused…..What abt Bombay Court decision?

    What abt Karnataka Court decisions

  24. Sachin Agarwal says:

    WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON… CBDT HAS CREATED AN UNHELATHY ATMOSPHERE AND THIS WILL LEAD TO A SENSE OF NON-COOPERATION ATTITUDE WHICH COULD SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES.. PERFECT EXAMPLE OF TAX TERRORRISM IN THE NATION

  25. Mehta says:

    F.No.22S/207/201S/ITA.II
    Government of India
    Ministry of Finance
    Department of Revenue
    Central Board of Direct Taxes
    North-Block, ITA.II Division
    New Delhi dated the 30th of September, 2015
    Order under Section 119 of the Income tax Act. 1961
    The Central Board of Direct Taxes, in compliance to the order of Hon’ble Gujarat High Court dated 29.09 .2015 in case of All Gujarat Federation of Tax Consultants vs. CBDT; Special Civil Application No. 15075 of 2015 and in exercise of powers conferred under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’), hereby orders that the returns of income due to be E-fiJed by 30th September,2015 may be filed by 31st October, 2015 in cases of Income-tax assessees of the State of Gujarat.
    2. This order shall be subject to the outcome of any further appeal/SLP which the CBDT may file against the said judgment.
    (Rohit Garg)
    Deputy-Secretary to the Government of India

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031