F.No.225/207/2016/ITA.II
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes

North-Block, TA.II Division

New Delhi dated the 30th of September, 2015

Order under Section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

The Karnataka State Chartered Accountants Association (‘KSCAA’) has Fled a representation dated 15.09.2015 in Central board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) seeking extension of date for filing returns from 30th, September. 2015. Subsequently KSCAA flied a PIL In Honble Karnataka High Court seeking intervention of Court in this matter.

Read More Below

Latest Status of various Petitions in High Courts for Extension of Tax Audit Due Date –

Tax Audit Date Extension- Status of High Courts Appeals

Author Bio

More Under Income Tax

Posted Under

Category : Income Tax (27925)
Type : Notifications/Circulars (32219) Orders (602)

0 responses to “CBDT rejects KSCAA representation on Extension of ITR/Tax Audit Due Date”

  1. deepakkathuria says:

    I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHY MY COMMENTS ARE DELETED

  2. deepakkathuria says:

    AS ON 01/10/2015 12.25 PM INCOME TAX SITE HAS NOT UPDATED EXTENTION OF DUE DATE OF RETURN TO 31/10/2015 .
    OFFICIALS WHO ARE IN CHARGE FOR UPDATION INCOME TAX SITE ARE LIVING IN VILLAGES

  3. RAJUL says:

    Can such order be passed u/s 119 as such section is meant for providing relief/ relaxation to the assessee and not rejecting a petition.

  4. CA Mahesh says:

    what a way to tell professionals in karnataka the website and schema needs to be changed for filing that is why not granted extension , now will they change the schema only for gujarat and punjab to inculde 234A,B,C interest .do not know who drafted the notification and reasons for rejection
    CBDT – Confused board of direct taxes

  5. LAKSH MALIK says:

    CBDT WAS TELLING TO DIFFERENT HIGH COURTS THAT THERE WERE VERY LESS CHANGES IN ITR AND TAR THIS TIME. MY QUESTION IS THEN WHY DIDN’T THEY NOTIFIED AND UPLOADED EFORMS ON IST APRIL 2015 ITSELF. DENYING FOUR MONTHS OF EFILING AND THEN BECOMING SO ARROGANT TO EXTEND THE DATE. THE ORDER OF EXTENSION FOR LIMITED STATES IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND WILL NOT STAND IN THE COURT OF LAW. ” EK TOH CHORI AUR UPAR SE SEENA JHORI IS WHAT CBDT HAS DONE”. IF WE ARE LIVING IN DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY, THIS ORDERS OF EXTENSION WHICH ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL WILL NOT STAND .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *