Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shakti Hormann Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Shakti Hormann Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

144C Is Not a Time-Extender: TP Assessment Quashed as Time-Barred- Draft Order in Time Won’t Save Final Order: DRP Route Can’t Beat Section 153;

The Hyderabad ITAT allowed the Assessee’s appeal on the legal issue and quashed the final assessment order as time-barred, holding that Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Investor Funds of Company Cannot Be Taxed as Director’s Personal Unexplained Money u/s 69A CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss Appeal In Limine Without Adjudication on Merits Section 153A Invoked for Wrong Year; Second Search Abates First – ITAT Quashes Search Assessment for AY 2020-21 Rural Agricultural Land Outside Section 56(2)(vii)(b): ITAT Deletes ₹59.33 Lakh Addition Wrong Email Service Invalidates Assessment, Matter Sent Back to AO View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031