Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penny Stock Addition u/s 68 Set Aside; Reopening Held Invalid for lack of Mind Application

Case Law Details

Case Name
Kalpana Ramesh Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2015-16
Advertisement Kalpana Ramesh Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee challenged reassessment for AYs 2015-16 to 2017-18 where alleged LTCG from Toyam Industries shares was treated as unexplained cash credit u/s 68. ITAT quashed reassessment across all three years primarily on jurisdictional defects including defective reasons, limitation issues and incorrect sanction authority. For AY 2015-16 & 2016-17, Tribunal held that reopening was based on factually incorrect and contradictory reasons — AO wrongly treated assessee as accommodation entry provider while later treating her as benefi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,965

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *