Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Ajay Kumar (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Ajay Kumar (ITAT Delhi) Bogus Purchase Addition Deleted Despite 133(6) Non-response: ITAT Upholds Genuineness Where Sales, Books and GST Records Accepted The Delhi ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeals for AYs 2021-22 and 2022-23 and upheld the CIT(A)’s deletion of massive additions of ₹15.17 crore on account of alleged bogus purchases and ₹97.49 lakh relating to freight TDS issues in the case of Ajay Kumar. The Assessing Officer had treated purchases as non-genuine under Section 69C mainly because several suppliers did not respond to notices issued under Section 133(6) and some ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031