Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Zia Rathi Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Zia Rathi Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

Cash Sales Accepted, Demonetisation Deposits Explained: ITAT Deletes ₹2.23 Cr Addition and Rejects Section 68/115BBE

The Delhi ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal and deleted the addition of ₹2.23 crore made under Section 68 on account of cash deposits during the demonetisation period. The assessee, a retail trader in imported PVC coated fabric, had explained that the deposits were made out of regular cash salesPlease become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

PCIT Cannot Convert Bogus Purchase Disallowance into Section 69C Income via Revision u/s 263 Intra-Group Loan Restructuring & Partner Account Reclassification Not Bogus Credits Reassessment for Bogus Purchases Quashed: Approval by Pr.CIT Invalid After 3 Years ITAT Selection Set Aside for Bias: SC Orders Fresh Committee Without Tainted Member Property Deal Addition Fails for Breach of Section 153C Time Limits View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Comments are closed.

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728