Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Myunghwa Automotive India Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Myunghwa Automotive India Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Penalty u/s 270A for PF/ESI disallowance deleted – Mere disallowance ≠ misreporting; Checkmate ruling not basis for penalty – ITAT Chennai In Myunghwa Automotive India Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO (A.Y. 2017-18), penalty of ₹5.28 lakh u/s 270A was levied at 200% alleging “misreporting of income” due to disallowance of delayed employees’ PF/ESI contributions u/s 36(1)(va). The CIT(A) upheld the penalty relying on the Supreme Court ruling in Checkmate Services. The ITAT held that penalty for misreporting u/s 270A(9) can be levied ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Occupancy Certificate Not Starting Point for Indexation: Bangalore ITAT Allows Benefit From Actual Use Date Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition Over Lack of Inquiry & Cross-Examination 10-Year Silence & Uncancelled GPA: SC Upholds Sale Against Fraud Claims Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT Unsigned Affidavit Can’t End Appeal: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow Defect Correction View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031