Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vicky Sherwani Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vicky Sherwani Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur) Cash Deposits Remain Unexplained – IDS Declaration & Past Withdrawals Not Accepted: ITAT Raipur Upholds Addition u/s 68 in Case of Money Lender Raipur ITAT dismissed Assessee’s appeal challenging an addition of ₹20,81,900/- made under section 68 read with section 115BBE. AO noticed large cash deposits in Assessee’s Allahabad Bank account & sought an explanation. The assessee, stated to be a money lender, claimed that the deposits were sourced from: 1. IDS Declaration of ₹10 lakh, 2. Cash income of ₹8.66 lakh for FY 2015-16, 3. Cash income...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031