ITAT Hyderabad Condones 182-Day Delay as Assessee Faced Liver Failure

Smt. Srilatha Bobbala Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Addition on Property Investment Sent Back Because Facts Needed Verification; ITAT Restores Case Because Property Advance Evidence Was Incomplete; Unexplained Investment Addition Reopened Because Bank Entries Were Unclear; ITAT Sets Aside CIT(A) Order Because Assessment Was Not Ex Parte. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Hyderabad condoned a delay of 182 days in filing an appeal by the assessee for Assessment Year 2015-16 after considering medical evidence showing that the assessee suffered severe liver complications, underwent unsuccessful...