Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Balakumar Radhakrishna Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Balakumar Radhakrishna Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) AO Cannot Revisit Old Figures—Change of Opinion Dooms Reassessment -No Fresh Material, No Reopening: ITAT Quashes 148 as Pure Review Assessee filed return for AY 2014-15 declaring income of Rs.5,94,710, which was accepted u/s 143(3) on 22.09.2016. AO later reopened assessment by issuing notice u/s 148 on 18.03.2019 alleging incorrect computation of LTCG, stating that Assessee wrongly applied full purchase value instead of 1/7th share for indexed cost. Tribunal noted from the recorded reasons   that reopening was entirely based on the same mater...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031