Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anand Mulky Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anand Mulky Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Turnover Accepted, Receipts Cannot Be Taxed Again– Demonetisation Deposits from Sundry Debtors -Double Taxation Not Permitted- 68 Addition Struck Down Bangalore dealt with addition of cash deposits made during demonetisation. Assessee, engaged in retail trading of Samsung mobile phones & SIM cards, filed his return for AY 2017-18 declaring income of ₹18.46 lakh. During scrutiny, AO noticed cash deposits of ₹8,89,878 in specified bank notes on 10.11.2016 & 15.11.2016. Out of this, ₹2,26,255 was accepted as explained opening balance, while the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Ahmedabad ITAT: Inability to Prove One Expense Cannot Justify Rejection of Entire Books of Account Ahmedabad ITAT Allows Full Exemption U/s 10(10B) on BSNL VRS Compensation, Rejects ‘Workman’ Restriction Ahmedabad ITAT Restricts Alleged On-Money Addition to Actual Investment Share of Co-owner Section 54B: Time to Revisit Rural Agricultural Land Withdrawal Rules Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction Allowed on Interest from Co-operative Bank Deposits: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031