Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sportking India Ltd Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sportking India Ltd Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi) Approval Defect Fatal- CIT’s Approval Cannot Replace JCIT Sanction -Strict Compliance of section 151 Mandatory -ITAT Delhi Deletes 14.75-Crore Reassessment Assessee filed return for AY 2006-07 declaring income of ₹35.13 lakh without offering MAT on book profits of ₹2.91 crore u/s 115JB. AO initially completed assessment u/s 143(3) on 23.12.2008. Subsequently, reassessment was initiated by issuing notice u/s 148 on 31.03.2011 & completed on 30.12.2011, determining income at ₹14.75 crore after making adjustments for earlier years’ depreciati...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031