Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sportking India Ltd Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Sportking India Ltd Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi) Approval Defect Fatal- CIT’s Approval Cannot Replace JCIT Sanction -Strict Compliance of section 151 Mandatory -ITAT Delhi Deletes 14.75-Crore Reassessment Assessee filed return for AY 2006-07 declaring income of ₹35.13 lakh without offering MAT on book profits of ₹2.91 crore u/s 115JB. AO initially completed assessment u/s 143(3) on 23.12.2008. Subsequently, reassessment was initiated by issuing notice u/s 148 on 31.03.2011 & completed on 30.12.2011, determining income at ₹14.75 crore after making adjustments for earlier years’ depreciati...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031