This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Commission-Based Business Proven: Tribunal Rejects Section 44AD and Upholds 5% Profit Rate
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs Mahamad Khayyum Mahamad Hanif Shaikh (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-2018
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ITO Vs Mahamad Khayyum Mahamad Hanif Shaikh (ITAT Pune)
Commission Agent, Not Trader -100% Cash Deposit Addition Replaced with Reasonable 5% Profit— ITAT Rejects 44AD -Revenue’s Appeal Fails
Assessee, engaged in the scrap trading/commission business, did not file ROI. Based on cash deposits of ₹99,73,439 in his account with Shri Renuka Mata Multi-State Urban Co-operative Society, AO reopened the case u/s 147. As assessee did not respond to statutory notices, AO treated the entire deposits as unexplained money u/s 69A, taxing 100% of the amount.
Before CIT(A), assessee ex...
Author Info
