MA is maintainable only if appeal is pending and not admitted

Shri Ratanlal C. Bafna Vs JCIT (ITAT Pune)

Shri Ratanlal C. Bafna Vs JCIT (ITAT Pune) When appeal has been filed before the Hon’ble High Court, the appeal is admitted and substantial question of law has been framed in the said appeal, then the Tribunal cannot recall the order. In the present case since the appeal against the order of the Tribunal has […]...

Read More

Deity is a juristic person & have status of individual for taxation

Vijaya Durga Devi Trust Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)

Vijaya Durga Devi Trust Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) It is an undisputed fact that the trust has been created in the year 1968 and as per the trust deed, the entire income is to be used for the upkeep of Deity. It is also an undisputed fact that the Deity is the sole beneficiary of […]...

Read More

Notice u/s 143(2) is invalid if it is issued but not served

Anil Kisanlal Marda Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

Since no effort was made by AO to serve another notice u/s. 143(2) before the deadline after returning from postal authorities the original notice u/s 143(2) thus, the jurisdictional condition of `service’ of notice u/s. 143(2) and not its `issue’ was not satisfied  and accordingly, assessment order passed in absence of a valid juris...

Read More

Section 54F exemption allowable if construction completes within a period of three years from the date of transfer of original asset

Shri Sohanlal Mohanlal Bhandari Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)

Shri Sohanlal Mohanlal Bhandari Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) Adverting to the facts of the instant case, it is seen from pages 5 and 6 of the impugned order that the assessee acquired land in two parts for construction of a new residential house, viz, the first part of the plot purchased on 11.10.2010 and the […]...

Read More

Consideration for Transfer of copyrighted software cannot be taxed as royalty

Ms. Sandvik Tooling Sverige AB Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)

Ms. Sandvik Tooling Sverige AB Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) The assessee is non-resident and was providing software services to Sandvik Asia Ltd. and also was providing IT support services to the said concern. The question which arises in the present appeal is whether the consideration received by assessee from the payer i.e. Sandvik Asia Pvt. [&h...

Read More

Deduction U/s. 80-IB(10) allowable to both owner & land developer

ITO Vs Ms. Skyline Developers (ITAT Pune)

Assessee who had contributed land and  engaged in the development of housing project with developer for development of the land was eligible for claiming deduction under section 80-IB(10) as both owner as well as developer were eligible for deduction under section 80-IB(10)....

Read More

Revisionary power U/s. 263 cannot be exercised on ground not covered in Re-Opening

Gulab Badgujar (HUF) Vs CIT (Central) (ITAT Pune)

Gulab Badgujar (HUF) Vs CIT (Central) (ITAT Pune) The question which arises is the exercise of revisionary jurisdiction by the Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263 of the Act against the order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act, wherein the assessment proceedings were re-opened on specific reasons recorded for re-op...

Read More

Addition for deemed rent of unsold flats cannot be made to Builder

M/s. Kolte Patil Developers Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)

M/s. Kolte Patil Developers Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) The issue in the present case is with respect to addition under the head ‘income from house property’ on the 32 unsold flats/shops by the assessee. It is an undisputed fact that assessee is in the business of Civil Engineers, Builders and Developers and had in […]...

Read More

ITAT condones delay in filing appeal as sufficient cause for delay was exist

Mercedes Benz Education Academy Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

The main plea of assessee was that because of multiplity of proceedings going on before different authorities filing of captioned appeal was delayed. The AR for the assessee had filed before ITAT an events chart of various assessment proceedings / appellate proceedings between the period 28.12.2007 to 21.05.2015, on which date the appeal ...

Read More

TDS not deductible on Payment of Wharfage Charges

M/s. Angre Port (P) Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

M/s. Angre Port (P) Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Wharfage charges are charged from the assessee and in such case, we hold that there is no use of land but even if it was held that there is any use of land, then the same was incidental but such payments could not be treated as […]...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,180)
Company Law (4,836)
Custom Duty (7,325)
DGFT (3,955)
Excise Duty (4,224)
Fema / RBI (3,779)
Finance (3,955)
Income Tax (30,259)
SEBI (3,150)
Service Tax (3,460)