Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anil Kumar Batar Vs PCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anil Kumar Batar Vs PCIT (ITAT Jaipur) No Second Chance for Fishing Enquiry- AO’s Plausible View Cannot Be Replaced by PCIT’s Suspicion- PCIT Cannot Step into AO’s Shoes: Jaipur Tribunal Quashes Revision Background Original assessment completed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B on 18.03.2023 at returned income of ₹19,89,250. Issue: During survey, it was found that Matrix JEE Academy (tenant) had allegedly paid ₹75,00,000 cash advance to assessee for building construction. AO in reassessment proceedings (u/s 148) considered assessee’s replies, accepted declared income, & made no addition on ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930