Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prakash Bhaguji Katkade Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Prakash Bhaguji Katkade Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Cosmos Group ‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted Again: ITAT Says Statement Alone Is Not Evidence The Mumbai ITAT deleted an addition of ₹14.25 lakh made under section 69A in the case of Prakash Bhaguji Katkade, holding that the Revenue failed to produce any credible evidence that the assessee had paid alleged “on-money” for purchase of a flat from the Cosmos Group. The reassessment was initiated on the basis of information received from the Investigation Wing following a search on the Cosmos Group. According to the Department, certain emails, exc...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031