Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Krishnakant Kishore Palav Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-2018
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Krishnakant Kishore Palav Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Gives Salaried Employee Relief: Genuine Return Mistake Deserves Correction, Not Tax on Wrong Income The Mumbai ITAT came to the rescue of a salaried taxpayer, Krishnakant Kishore Palav, holding that a bona fide mistake in the return of income should be examined on merits rather than being rejected on technical grounds of delay. The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The assessee had worked with two employers during FY 2016-17 and earned s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai Section 69A Cannot Be Invoked for Cash Withdrawals from Own Bank Account Income Declared in Original Return Cannot Be Reduced in Section 148 Return: ITAT Hyderabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031