ITAT Jaipur

Insignificant decline in G.P. cannot be a reason for addition

Ramanand Industries Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)

Ramanand Industries Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) It is settled proposition of law that even if the books of account are rejected U/s 145(3) of the Act, it would not ipso facto result to an addition except the income estimated on same reasonable and proper basis lead to an addition. In the case in hand, neither […]...

Read More

Penalty order barred by limitation u/s 275(1)(c) is not valid

ITO Vs Shri Prashant Sharma (ITAT Jaipur)

Order of penalty passed under sections 271D and 271E was to set aside as the same was passed after expiry of six months from the action initiated for imposition of penalty and barred by limitation as per section 275(1)(c)....

Read More

Issue & Service of Notice U/s. 148 is to be complied mandatorily: ITAT

Charan Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)

Charan Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) (i) Under Section 148 of the Act, the issue of notice to the Assessee and service of such notice upon the Assessee are jurisdictional requirements that must be mandatorily complied with. They are not mere procedural requirements. (ii) For the AO to exercise jurisdiction to reopen an assessment, notice [&h...

Read More

Interest on Loan for Land purchased and shown as Stock in Trade is revenue expense

Model Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur)

Model Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur) The fact of showing this land in the books of account as stock in trade is not in dispute, however, the ld. CIT(A) has denied the claim on the ground that the assessee has not undertaken any activity which could lead to the inference that the assessee […]...

Read More

S. 40A(3) Validity of Cash payments exceeding limit to Electricity Board

Ayub Ali Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur)

Ayub Ali Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur) The assessee has entered into an agreement with a Government Hospital in Bikaner whereby it operates the MRI and CT Scan machines. The nature of such activities therefore demand a continuous supply of electricity and the assessee cannot risk the life of the patients especially those admitted in emergency [&h...

Read More

Sustainability of Ad hoc disallowance of travelling & conveyance expenses

Sh. Naresh Kumar Luhadia Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)

Sh. Naresh Kumar Luhadia Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur) Full picture of how travelling expenses and conveyance expenses were being incurred by assessee was brought to the notice of AO in writing but AO, instead of appreciating facts and circumstances of the case, just made simple observation that assessee’s reply was very general in nature. Ther...

Read More

MAT not payable on share income of member of AOP

ACIT Vs M/s Om Metal Infraproject Ltd. (ITAT Jaipur)

ACIT Vs M/s Om Metal Infraproject Ltd. (ITAT Jaipur) Clause (iic) inserted in Explanation 1 to section 115JB by the Finance Act, 2015 is remedial and curative in nature as it was brought in the statute to provide similar benefit to the member of the AOP which was earlier applicable to the partner of the […]...

Read More

No disallowance U/s. 40(a)(ia) where net profit was estimated

Power Liners Vs. ACIT (ITAT Jaipur)

Once the income of the assessee was estimated after rejection of books of account, then, the AO could not make disallowance on the same books of account for the purpose of disallowance by invoking provisions of section 40(a)(ia) or general disallowance under section 37(1). Hence, the disallowance made by the AO was deleted....

Read More

ITAT condones delay in appeal filing due to fighting with CA

Shri Nitesh Agarwal, Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur)

Shri Nitesh Agarwal Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur) The assessee has explained the reasons for delay as attributable to the various problems on the business front, family front as well as the assessee was having some dispute with his C.A. In support of his explanation, the assessee has filed the record regarding the complaint against the […]...

Read More

Addition for Gift justified on failure to substantiate claim of gift received

Shri. Vicky Jethani Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)

Shri Vicky Jethani Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) We note that the assessee has claimed the gift of Rs. 8,00,000/- received from Smt. Poonaj Kanjani stated to be the Aunt of the assessee and non-resident Indian based at UAE. In support of the claim, the assessee has furnished the Bank Certificate of Bank of Baroda regarding […]...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,011)
Company Law (4,332)
Custom Duty (7,186)
DGFT (3,847)
Excise Duty (4,176)
Fema / RBI (3,587)
Finance (3,802)
Income Tax (28,846)
SEBI (3,039)
Service Tax (3,424)