Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dineshchand Surana Vs UCO Bank (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Dineshchand Surana Vs UCO Bank (Supreme Court of India) “Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – Sections 138, 141, 143-A, 148; Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Sections 96, 101, 124, 128, 79(15); Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Section 395. Issue was whether moratorium under Part III of the IBC bars proceedings under Section 138 NI Act against a person undergoing personal insolvency/bankruptcy and against directors vicariously liable under Section 141. Held that Section 138, though quasi-criminal and arising from a civil transaction, is predominantly criminal in nature; th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CS Piyush Goyal is an associate member of the ICSI and the founder of Piyush Goyal & Associates (Practicing Company Secretaries Firm) based in Jaipur. I am a competent professional having great post-qualification experience in GST, Income tax, Corporate Law, Labour law, SEBI, RBI etc. I have View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Continuing Personal Guarantee Not Revoked by Resignation or Loan Renewal: NCLAT Delhi Decisions Based on AI-Hallucinated Precedents Unsustainable: SC NCLT Refuses Company Restoration as ROC Fails to Justify 4215-Day Delay NCLAT Allows Jagran EOGM but Keeps Director Removal Resolutions in Abeyance Calcutta HC Bars Shifting of Registered Office If IBC Appeal Pending View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031