Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ronak Ashvin Sanghavi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Ronak Ashvin Sanghavi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The Mumbai ITAT deleted additions made against Ronak Ashvin Sanghavi on account of alleged bogus Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) from shares of GFL Finance India Ltd., holding that the Revenue had failed to produce any cogent evidence linking the assessee with any price manipulation or accommodation entry arrangement. The assessee had earned LTCG of ₹12.25 lakh on sale of shares purchased through a recognised stock exchange and claimed exemption under section 10(38). Based on information received from the Kolkata Investigation Wing regarding alleged ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031