Case Law Details
Case Name : Malti Garg Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Chandigarh
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Malti Garg Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Conclusion: Cash deposits made by assessee during the demonetization period were explained as being sourced from earlier withdrawals and household savings, and deleted the addition of ₹10,46,500 made under section 69A.
Held: Assessee was a senior citizen, had deposited ₹10,46,000 in specified bank notes into her bank account during November 2016 and was subjected to scrutiny for the Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18. AO treated the deposits as unexplained money under section 69A on the ground that assessee had failed to substantiate the source of cash. On ap...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

