Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Malti Garg Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Malti Garg Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Conclusion: Cash deposits made by assessee during the demonetization period were explained as being sourced from earlier withdrawals and household savings, and deleted the addition of ₹10,46,500 made under section 69A. Held: Assessee was a senior citizen, had deposited ₹10,46,000 in specified bank notes into her bank account during November 2016 and was subjected to scrutiny for the Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18. AO treated the deposits as unexplained money under section 69A on the ground that assessee had failed to substantiate the source of cash. On ap...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930