ITAT Chandigarh

Section 44AD not obligates assessee to maintain books of account

Nand Lal Popli Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)

Nand Lal Popli Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh) Assessing Officer, for making the impugned addition has started with the presumption that an amount to the extent of 92% of the gross receipts is the expenditure incurred by the assessee, which is a totally wrong premise. If the income component is estimated, how the expenditure component on [&hell...

Read More

Interest for TDS Default levied on Buyer of Property even if NRI Seller Already Paid Taxes in his Return

Sh. Harpal Singh Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)

The issue under consideration is whether interest u/s 201(1A) will be levied on assessee even if NRI seller had already paid taxes as per his return?...

Read More

Interest on Enhanced Compensation u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is Exempt u/s 10(37)

ITO Vs Sh. Dhanender Kumar HUF (ITAT Chandigarh)

whether interest received u/s 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on compulsory acquisition of agricultural land in the nature of compensation is exempt u/s 10(37) or chargeable to tax under head 'Income from Other Sources'?...

Read More

IDC receipts for State Government cannot be taxed in the Hands of Assessee

Infrastructure Development Fund Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)

The issue under consideration is whether the CIT(A) is correct in upholding IDC receipts as normal trading receipts ignoring that the money belongs to state government?...

Read More

Section 2(22)(e) Deeming fiction cannot be applied on mere suspicion

ACIT Vs Shri Gurdeep Singh (ITAT Chandigarh)

ACIT Vs Shri Gurdeep Singh (ITAT Chandigarh) The intention behind enacting provisions of section 2(22) (e) are that closely held companies (i.e. companies in which public are not substantially interested), which are controlled by a group of members, even though the company has accumulated profits would not distribute such profit as divide...

Read More

No Disallowance U/s. 40(a)(ia) if retainer-ship expense shown by recipient in their return

Demarte Silk and Sarees Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)

The issue under consideration is whether A.O. is correct in disallowing the expense of retainership debited in P & L on the basis of non deduction of TDS u/s 194C when the Same was shown as salary by recipient in their Income Tax return?...

Read More

No Section 271D Penalty for cash received from commission agent against sale of crops

Hardeep. Singh Vs JCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)

Transactions between the assessee and the Commission Agent were relating to the sale of agriculture crops, therefore, there was no receipt or repayment of loan or deposit, accordingly penalty levied by the A.O. and sustained by the Ld. CIT(A) under section 271 E of the Act is also deleted....

Read More

Depreciation @ 60% allowable on Set Top Boxes acquired on Finance Lease

Fastway Transmission (P) Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh)

Fastway Transmission (P) Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh) Conclusion: Set top boxes was the property of CISCO which was taken by assessee on lease from CISCO against payment of lease charges thus assessee was not entitled to claim the principal component of alleged lease rent paid as ‘revenue expenditure’ u/s 37(1) however, entitled to ...

Read More

Penalty cannot be imposed for mere Section 12A registration cancellation

Guru Nanak Public School Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh)

TAT see no reason to uphold the levy of penalty in the present case U/s 271(1)(c) of the Act, since the basis for levy of penalty, being cancellation of registration granted to the assessee U/s 12A of the Act and as a consequence treating its surplus and corpus donation as not exempt but taxable under the Act, has been quashed by the ITAT...

Read More

No Exemption from MAT as Assessee is a developer not having any unit in a SEZ

Gee City Builders (P) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)

Assessee was not eligible for exemption from payment of MAT as per the provisions of section 115JB(6), since, admittedly, it did not qualify as a business or services rendered by an entrepreneur or developer in a unit or SEZ as per definition of the said terms in the SEZ Act....

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,936)
Company Law (6,564)
Custom Duty (7,957)
DGFT (4,325)
Excise Duty (4,390)
Fema / RBI (4,359)
Finance (4,612)
Income Tax (34,448)
SEBI (3,670)
Service Tax (3,594)

Search Posts by Date

September 2020