During the assessment proceedings, AO provided many opportunities to the Assessee to explain the nature and source of deposits made during the demonization period, however, the Assessee did not gave any satisfactory explanation during the assessment proceedings.
ITAT Chandigarh held that reassessment order under section 147 of the Income Tax Act cannot be passed without compliance with mandatory requirement of notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. Thus, order passed u/s. 144 r/w 147 set aside.
ITAT Chandigarh dismissed the appeals filed by the revenue since the tax effect involved in the same is less than prescribed monetary limit of Rs. 60 lacs in terms of the CBDT Circular No.09/2024 dated 17.09.2024.
ITAT Chandigarh sets aside ₹29.5 lakh addition against Bachan Kaur, allowing a fresh hearing due to her illness and husband’s death.
Revision order was remanded back for re-examination of assessee qualification as venture capital as where the amount had been received from the Venture Capitalists, the provisions of section 56(2)(viib) were not applicable.
ITAT Chandigarh held that since Form 67 has actually been filed within extended date of filing the return of income hence Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) claimed by the assessee is granted.
ITAT Chandigarh held that passing of an ex-parte order by CIT(A) without considering the merits of the case is unjustified. Accordingly, matter restored to the file of CIT(A) for fresh consideration.
ITAT Chandigarh held that since notices were issued through ITBA portal only it cannot be treated as a valid service of notice. Accordingly, proceedings initiated under section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act is liable to be quashed.
ITAT Chandigarh rules that the assessee cannot be denied Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) due to delay in filing Form No. 67.
ITAT Chandigarh ruled on Ashish Sood Vs DCIT case, deciding whether Foreign Tax Credit is eligible when Form 67 is filed after due date but before assessment.
