Read the detailed analysis of Karrm Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT at ITAT Mumbai. Learn why ITAT ruled that non-filing of GST by suppliers can’t justify reopening an assessment after 4 years.
Chemstar International Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) mere suspicion or cancellation of registration post-donation not invalidate initial eligibility for Section 35(1)(ii)deduction.
Explore the detailed ITAT Mumbai order analysis of Yogesh P. Thakkar vs DCIT, focusing on disputed long-term capital gains and commission expenditure.
Read the full text of the ITAT Mumbai order in DCIT vs. Dilip B. Jiwrajka covering appeals against additions of unexplained income and commission under IT Act sections 68 & 69C for AYs 2012-13 to 2015-16.
Reopening of assessment beyond four-year limitation period invalid if AO fails to establish failure on the part of Assessee to fully and truly disclose all material facts necessary for assessment.
Read about the ITAT Mumbai’s ruling in AVTIL Enterprises Ltd Vs PCIT, where the invocation of section 263 was challenged for the AY 2017-18.
Explore the detailed ITAT Mumbai order on Trustar Diamonds appeal against ACIT for A.Y. 2012-13, addressing alleged bogus purchases in the diamond industry.
Read the full text of the ITAT Mumbai order in the case of Krimesh Ramesh Divecha Vs DCIT for A.Y. 2015-16. Understand the assessment details and implications.
Explore ITAT Delhi’s ruling on dividend income exemption under section 11 of IT Act 1961. Detailed analysis of judgment against Revenue appeal for AY 2021-22.
Explore the case of Shaily Prince Goyal vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) regarding cash credits from penny stock sales. Detailed analysis of Section 10(38), 45, and 69C under Income Tax Act, 1961.
