Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jorabat Shillong Expressway Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Jorabat Shillong Expressway Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT held that concessionaire rights under a BOT/DBFOT agreement (right to operate and receive annuity) constitute an intangible asset eligible for depreciation u/s 32(1)(ii). The assessee had constructed a highway project at its own cost under an NHAI concession and claimed depreciation @25% on the capitalized cost treated as intangible asset (right to receive annuity). The AO denied depreciation, treating the road as not owned by the assessee, and instead allowed amortization as per CBDT Circular 9/2014. The Tribunal found that the dep...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 153C Proceedings Invalid Where Deemed Search Date Is After 1-4-2021: ITAT Bangalore Selling & Marketing Expenses Cannot Be Disallowed Due to Ledger Nomenclature Error: ITAT Bangalore Executive Search Fees Not Taxable as FTS or Royalty Under India–Netherlands DTAA: ITAT Mumbai No TDS on Reimbursement of Common Legal Expenses: ITAT Mumbai BSNL VRS Employees Eligible for Full Exemption of Retrenchment Compensation & Leave Encashment: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031