Explore the detailed case of Sankpal Developers vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai) regarding the treatment of unsecured loans under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Understand the implications of proving creditworthiness and genuineness in tax assessments.
Detailed analysis of ACIT Vs Mansha Agencies Pvt Ltd (ITAT Mumbai) case where Mumbai ITAT rules that additions can’t be made in unabated assessments without incriminating material. Read the full text of the ITAT Mumbai order.
Explore Arun Babulal Shah Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai) case where unsecured loans and business losses are analyzed. Detailed ITAT Mumbai order overview, analysis, and conclusion.
Read the full text of the ITAT Mumbai order in Laxman Gore Shreshtha Vs DCIT. Analysis of reassessment based on incorrect details and implications for assessment under Income Tax Act.
In the case of Anil Champalal Jain vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai), learn why Mumbai ITAT ruled that cash deposits during demonetization alone cannot justify income addition without clear evidence of accounting errors. Read the full text of the order for detailed insights.
Read the detailed analysis of Karrm Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT at ITAT Mumbai. Learn why ITAT ruled that non-filing of GST by suppliers can’t justify reopening an assessment after 4 years.
Chemstar International Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) mere suspicion or cancellation of registration post-donation not invalidate initial eligibility for Section 35(1)(ii)deduction.
Explore the detailed ITAT Mumbai order analysis of Yogesh P. Thakkar vs DCIT, focusing on disputed long-term capital gains and commission expenditure.
Read the full text of the ITAT Mumbai order in DCIT vs. Dilip B. Jiwrajka covering appeals against additions of unexplained income and commission under IT Act sections 68 & 69C for AYs 2012-13 to 2015-16.
Reopening of assessment beyond four-year limitation period invalid if AO fails to establish failure on the part of Assessee to fully and truly disclose all material facts necessary for assessment.