Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rishiraj Radheshyam Gupta Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rishiraj Radheshyam Gupta Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT set aside an ex-parte assessment involving ₹2.52 crore addition for alleged unexplained property investment, holding that the assessee was denied effective opportunity due to communication and procedural lapses. The Tribunal observed: Assessment was completed u/s 144 ex-parte due to non-compliance Notices were sent to old address and email IDs not under assessee’s control The assessee, a senior citizen, was dependent on his CA and unaware of proceedings CIT(A) also passed order without proper consideration of facts and evidence ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930